Four Actions Framework
The Four Actions Framework, from Kim & Mauborgne's Blue Ocean Strategy, forces you to redesign the buyer value curve by asking four questions about your industry's accepted factors of competition: (1) Which factors should be Eliminated that the industry takes for granted? (2) Which factors should be Reduced well below industry standard? (3) Which factors should be Raised well above industry standard? (4) Which factors should be Created that the industry has never offered? The first two questions cut cost structure. The last two boost buyer value. Together they break the value-cost trade-off and create a new value curve.
The Trap
The trap is using ERRC as a brainstorming list against existing customer requests, which produces a feature roadmap, not a blue ocean. Customers anchor on what they already buy. ERRC was designed to be applied to non-customer attributes — to factors that the industry competes on but that no one outside the industry actually values. If your Eliminate column only contains things your customers already complained about, you're optimizing the red ocean. The whole point is to eliminate what the industry over-delivers and create what the industry never thought to offer.
What to Do
Run ERRC in this order, not as parallel columns: (1) List every factor of competition the industry currently invests in (typically 8-15 factors). (2) For each, score 'how much do non-customers actually care about this?' from 0-10. (3) Eliminate anything scoring 0-2. (4) Reduce anything scoring 3-5. (5) For the Create column, interview 10 non-customers about what made them reject the category — those rejections are your Create candidates. (6) Draw the new value curve and verify it diverges sharply from competitors.
Formula
In Practice
Yellow Tail wine (Casella Wines, 2001) used the Four Actions Framework to enter the US wine market against 1,600 existing brands. They eliminated wine terminology, aging quality, and above-the-line marketing. They reduced wine complexity, range of offerings, and vineyard prestige. They raised retail store involvement and ease of selection. They created easy drinking, ease of selection, and fun & adventure. Result: Yellow Tail became the #1 imported wine in the US within two years, selling to non-wine-drinkers (beer & cocktail consumers) — a market the industry had ignored.
Pro Tips
- 01
If your ERRC grid has more than 3 items in any column, you're not making real choices. Strategic clarity demands tight constraints — 2 to eliminate, 2 to reduce, 2 to raise, 2 to create is the typical Blue Ocean signature.
- 02
Score your draft strategy: if Eliminate + Reduce don't materially cut your cost structure (target: 30%+ cost reduction), you don't have a blue ocean — you have a premium product.
- 03
The Create column is the hardest. Most teams default to 'better service' or 'more features.' Real Create items come from observing what people do INSTEAD of buying the category — Cirque du Soleil's 'artistic music & dance' came from observing that adults chose theater over circus.
Myth vs Reality
Myth
“ERRC is a creative brainstorming exercise”
Reality
It's a forcing function for strategic discipline. The power is in the cuts (Eliminate + Reduce), not the additions. Most teams skip the cuts because they're politically painful — but without cuts, there's no cost reduction to fund the value innovation, and the new offer becomes a premium product, not a blue ocean.
Myth
“You apply ERRC to your own product”
Reality
You apply it to the INDUSTRY'S factors of competition, not to your product features. The unit of analysis is what every competitor is forced to invest in to play the game. If you're only changing your own product without changing the industry's accepted factors, you're doing product management, not strategy.
Try it
Run the numbers.
Pressure-test the concept against your own knowledge — answer the challenge or try the live scenario.
Knowledge Check
A budget hotel chain runs ERRC and ends up with: Eliminate (lobby decor, room service), Reduce (staff count), Raise (bed quality, soundproofing), Create (24-hour self-check-in). What's the most likely issue with this strategy?
Industry benchmarks
Is your number good?
Calibrate against real-world tiers. Use these ranges as targets — not absolutes.
Blue Ocean Cost Reduction (vs Industry Average)
Cost structure of canonical Blue Ocean cases (Cirque du Soleil, Yellow Tail, Southwest, Nintendo Wii)Strong Blue Ocean
30-50% lower
Real Cost Innovation
15-30% lower
Marginal Differentiation
0-15% lower
Premium Product (Not Blue Ocean)
Higher than industry
Source: Kim & Mauborgne, Blue Ocean Strategy (2005), Harvard Business Review Press
Real-world cases
Companies that lived this.
Verified narratives with the numbers that prove (or break) the concept.
Yellow Tail (Casella Wines)
2001-2003
Casella Wines, an Australian family winery, applied ERRC to the US wine industry. They eliminated wine terminology, aging quality complexity, and above-the-line marketing. They reduced wine complexity, range of offerings, and vineyard prestige. They raised retail store involvement (paying staff to evangelize) and ease of selection (just two SKUs: Chardonnay & Shiraz). They created easy drinking, fun, and adventure for non-wine-drinkers. The new value curve targeted beer and cocktail drinkers, not existing wine buyers.
Time to Market Leadership
2 years
Position
#1 imported wine in US
Volume (Year 2)
4.5 million cases
SKU Count
2 (vs 100s for competitors)
Yellow Tail's success came from applying ERRC to NON-WINE-DRINKER attributes. Existing wine drinkers wanted complexity; non-customers wanted simplicity. ERRC works only when targeted at non-customers.
Cirque du Soleil
1984-2000
Founded by street performers in Quebec, Cirque du Soleil applied ERRC to the dying circus industry. Eliminated: animal shows, star performers, multiple show arenas. Reduced: fun & humor, thrill & danger. Raised: unique venue. Created: theme, refined environment, multiple productions, artistic music & dance. The result was a new category — 'theatrical circus' — that targeted adults willing to pay theater prices, not children's families.
Industry State at Entry
Declining 5%/year
Cirque Revenue (2000)
$1B+
Audience
Adults (not children)
Ticket Price
Theater-level (3-5x circus)
Cirque didn't compete with Ringling Bros — they redefined the category by combining circus + theater. The Create items came from observing what adults chose INSTEAD of circus (Broadway shows). That's where blue oceans live.
Decision scenario
ERRC for a B2B SaaS Pivot
You run a mid-market HRIS competing against Workday, BambooHR, and Rippling. CAC is climbing, win rates are dropping. Your team proposes applying the Four Actions Framework to escape the feature war.
ARR
$8M
Win Rate
12% (down from 22%)
CAC Payback
28 months
Industry Feature Count
180+
Your Feature Count
165
Decision 1
Your team builds an ERRC grid. Eliminate column has 4 items (org charts, time-off approvals, performance reviews, custom report builder). Raise has 6 items (mobile UX, onboarding speed, integration depth). Create has 1 item (AI-generated compliance reports). Reduce is empty. Engineering says cutting org charts will lose 30% of customers immediately.
Cut the Eliminate list to 1 item (custom report builder) to keep customers happy, but keep all 6 Raise items and the 1 Create itemReveal
Reframe ERRC around non-customers: interview 20 SMBs that rejected HRIS entirely (using spreadsheets + Slack). Build the new value curve from their actual barriers — pricing per employee, setup complexity, vendor lock-in✓ OptimalReveal
Related concepts
Keep connecting.
The concepts that orbit this one — each one sharpens the others.
Beyond the concept
Turn Four Actions Framework into a live operating decision.
Use this concept as the framing layer, then move into a diagnostic if it maps directly to a current bottleneck.
Typical response time: 24h · No retainer required
Turn Four Actions Framework into a live operating decision.
Use Four Actions Framework as the framing layer, then move into diagnostics or advisory if this maps directly to a current business bottleneck.