Home/Glossary/Compare

Switching CostsvsChurn Rate

Both are essential business concepts — but they measure very different things.

💡

The Concept

🔒Switching Costs

Switching costs are the barriers (financial, procedural, emotional) that make it expensive or difficult for a customer to switch to a competitor. Higher switching costs = higher retention and pricing power. There are 4 types: Financial (Salesforce's $10K+ migration cost), Procedural (retraining 200 employees on a new CRM takes 6 months), Data (your 5 years of Slack messages are trapped), and Emotional (brand loyalty, familiarity). Apple's ecosystem has all four: $2,000+ in repurchased apps, learning a new OS, losing iMessage/AirDrop interoperability, and identity attachment. This is why Apple's iPhone retention rate exceeds 92%.

🚪Churn Rate

Churn rate measures the percentage of customers who cancel or stop paying during a given time period. It is the silent killer of SaaS businesses — even a small monthly churn compounds into massive annual losses. A 5% monthly churn sounds manageable, but compounded over 12 months, you lose 46% of your customer base. To maintain the same revenue, you need to acquire enough new customers to replace nearly HALF your base every year. This is why the best SaaS companies obsess over churn — Slack's monthly churn below 1% means they retain 89% of customers annually, creating a compounding revenue machine.

⚠️

The Trap

🔒Switching Costs

The trap is building switching costs through lock-in that customers resent instead of value they can't replicate. If your switching costs come from making it HARD to leave (hiding the export button, proprietary data formats), customers will leave the moment a competitor makes it easier. Oracle's notoriously complex contracts created resentment-based switching costs that drove the 'Oracle exit' movement. But Notion's switching costs come from VALUE — your team has built 1,000+ pages of documented processes that work because of Notion's specific features. When switching costs come from accumulated value, customers don't want to leave.

🚪Churn Rate

The trap is tracking only 'logo churn' (customers lost) and ignoring 'revenue churn' (revenue lost from downgrades). You could have 3% logo churn but 8% revenue churn if your largest customers are downgrading. Revenue churn is more dangerous because it hits your top line harder. The second trap: calculating churn from the wrong denominator. Always use start-of-period customers, not end-of-period or average. Using end-of-period inflates your denominator and makes churn look artificially low.

🎯

The Action

🔒Switching Costs

Audit your switching cost stack using the 4-type framework: (1) Financial: What would a customer spend to switch? (Migration cost + new tool cost + lost productivity). Target: 6+ months of revenue equivalent. (2) Procedural: How long does it take to reach current productivity on a competitor? Target: 3+ months. (3) Data: How much irreplaceable data/history lives in your product? Target: 12+ months of accumulated data. (4) Emotional: How does the customer identify with your brand? Calculate your 'Switching Cost Score' by rating each type 1-5 and summing. Score of 12+ = strong retention moat.

🚪Churn Rate

Calculate two churn metrics monthly: Logo Churn = Customers Lost ÷ Start-of-Month Customers × 100. Revenue Churn = MRR Lost (cancellations + downgrades) ÷ Start-of-Month MRR × 100. Implement an exit survey on your cancellation page to identify the #1 reason people leave — the top reason is usually fixable. Target: under 5% monthly for SMB SaaS, under 2% for mid-market, under 1% for enterprise.

📐

Formulas

Total Switching Cost = Migration Cost + Retraining Cost + Productivity Loss + Data Migration Risk
Monthly Churn Rate = (Lost Customers ÷ Start-of-Month Customers) × 100%

Explore more business concepts

Browse all concepts or try our free calculators to apply what you've learned.

Browse All Concepts →