Product-Market Fit (PMF)vsPricing Strategy

Product-Market Fit is the degree to which your product satisfies a strong market demand. When you have PMF, customers are actively pulling your product from you rather than you pushing it onto them. Marc Andreessen defined it as 'being in a good market with a product that can satisfy that market.' The Sean Ellis test quantifies it: if 40%+ of users say they'd be 'very disappointed' without your product, you have PMF. Before PMF, nothing else matters — marketing spend is wasted, hiring is premature, and features are guesses. After PMF, everything gets easier: organic growth appears, retention improves, and word-of-mouth starts compounding.

Pricing strategy determines how much you charge customers and directly impacts revenue, positioning, and perceived value. The three primary approaches: (1) Cost-Plus: price = cost + margin (lazy, leaves money on the table). (2) Competitor-Based: match or undercut competitors (race to the bottom). (3) Value-Based: charge 10-20% of the value you create for the customer (optimal). If your product saves a customer $50,000/year, charging $5,000/year (10% of value) is the sweet spot. The customer gets 10x ROI, and you capture meaningful revenue. Pricing is the fastest lever for revenue growth — a 1% price increase typically adds 11% to profits.

Founders declare PMF too early based on vanity metrics — sign-ups, press coverage, 'exciting conversations' with potential customers. True PMF means users would be genuinely disappointed if your product disappeared. The second trap: assuming PMF is binary and permanent. PMF exists on a spectrum and can erode as markets shift (Blackberry had PMF until iPhone changed the market). Also: PMF for one segment doesn't mean PMF for another — you might have PMF with startups but not enterprises.

The biggest trap is pricing based on cost ('it costs $10 to deliver, so I'll charge $15'). This leaves massive value on the table. If your product saves a customer $10,000/year, charging $50/month ($600/year) captures only 6% of value — criminally underpriced regardless of your costs. The second trap: not testing prices. Most SaaS companies set pricing once and never change it. You should test pricing quarterly. The third trap: too many tiers. More than 3-4 tiers creates decision paralysis. Dropbox went from 4 tiers to 3 and saw conversion increase 15%.

Run the Sean Ellis survey: ask existing users 'How would you feel if you could no longer use [product]?' with options: Very Disappointed, Somewhat Disappointed, Not Disappointed. If 40%+ say 'Very Disappointed,' you likely have PMF. If not, interview the disappointed users to learn what they love, and double down on that specific value. Track the PMF score quarterly — it should improve as you refine the product.

Use value-based pricing: (1) Interview 10 customers and ask: 'How much money or time does our product save you?' (2) Calculate the average value created. (3) Price at 10-20% of that value. (4) Create 3 tiers (Starter, Pro, Enterprise) with clear feature differentiation. (5) Test annually: A/B test pricing pages, conduct Van Westendorp surveys, and monitor win rates by price point.